Monthly Archives: May 2019

Sapir–Whorf hypothesis,

The hypothesis of linguistic relativity holds that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ world view or cognition. Also known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis, or Whorfianism, the principle is often defined to include two versions: the strong hypothesis and the weak hypothesis:

  • The strong version says that language determines thought and that linguistic categories limit and determine cognitive categories.
  • The weak version says that linguistic categories and usage only influence thought and decisions.

This model The RMCM may well have a similar effect – I have experienced this for years as the model came slowly into focus.



The smallest construct in the known Universe is the “Point”. Our universe is constructed entirely of points. We lack any material capacity to investigate Points directly, which is a limit on science and physics. Existential, persistent, and discrete, “The Point” is amorphous. The sheer number of Points in the known universe is unimaginable. Clearly this means something.

Is it paradox or irony that Points can’t move? Points are locations. If  Points can’t move, then how do we move? We are made entirely of Points.

Open your heart; open your mind. As God is my witness …

Points are events. They arise from the Delta AxisTM. As soon as a Point  emerges from Delta it disappears. This the case for any given Point. We can move by delta rebuilding us as we move.

Gravity or Mass – the chicken or the egg

Gravity and Mass – the chicken or the egg
The consensus is, “gravity arises from mass”, and we come to understand that the greater the mass the greater its gravity. Unfortunately, velocity also increases mass and does so without any significant increase in gravity. This is a paradox. This paradox still remains, and this may have led to a quagmire of compensating theories and complicated arithmetic. The most definitive of these work arounds is Schrödinger’s cat, which requires something called a state. To try and explain our world further we are enjoined by other words such as force (strong and weak), as well as …

“… quantitative concepts like mass, force, velocity, mole; qualitative concepts like organic/inorganic, animate/inanimate, solid/liquid/gas, and intelligence; and theoretical concepts like inertia, entropy, valence, and natural selection.” link

We accept these words at face value, and in fact learning many more Words so familiar to us that their truth seems obvious or self-evident. As our children grow they will encounter many of these words and cope with the incumbent mathematics as well as concepts, ideologies, philosophies, dogmas, and theologies that quickly increase complication. {complexity} and:

confusion, difficulty, obstacle, problem, snag, aggravation, development, dilemma, drawback, embarrassment, entanglement and on and on.

All these and so many more essential and common words that the language of logical learning spreads among a thinning student base. Leaving many with poorly developed logical reasoning and unfinished explanations.

This cynical observation presumes three principles:

First Principles
RMCM : 5 …Mathematics is the manipulation of Function and Form to elucidate Cause and Effect.

First Principles
RMCM : 6 …Science is the manipulation of Cause and Effect to elucidate Function and Form.

First Principles
RMCM : 7 … In the cases of Mathematics and Science, Technology is the final proof.

We have surrendered to a Logical Universe of only one infinity – the outwardly infinite. Imagine instead two infinities. A true Divinity that is both outwardly and inwardly infinite.

Where would we even start? The RMCM asserts We start by encapsulation, and we call this Divinity “The Rational”.

In “The Rational” instead of gravity arising from mass the RMCM hypothesizes quite the opposite – that gravity is the source of mass. In this assertion whole categories of words are orphaned along with the connections they enjoyed. To implement the new paradigm we will need a new lexicon by which we can reorganize the language of our experiences and their connections.

Respectfully and Fraternally DWCRMCM
Custodian of the Fourth Experience Church of the Fourth Experience – C4E